Umik2 falls at 14-15kHz with REW

Robert Johansson

Registered
Thread Starter
Joined
Oct 30, 2020
Messages
14
Hello all!

Has anybody got a clue what it is that might be wrong if my measurements always drops too early? They are never straight up too 20kHz. I have tested with many different tweeters that i know is linear to above 20kHz but in REW with calibrated Umik2 and sample set at the same (48kHz but tried different) on both microphone and REW and D/A converter (optical out from macbook to Hegel D/A)
I have tested different amps and cables as well. Can it be a faulty calibration file? Many thanks for any help in advance and sorry if this question has come up before.
7520B1C7-C922-4393-9F1F-4E9872BE4D38.jpeg
 

John Mulcahy

REW Author
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
7,342
Have you placed the mic directly in front of the tweeter for a near field measurement?
 

thothsong

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2021
Messages
393
You're using the 0-degree cal file for the near field measurement, mic pointed at the tweeter? What does that cal file look like, loaded into REW?
 

Robert Johansson

Registered
Thread Starter
Joined
Oct 30, 2020
Messages
14
Yes, 0 degrees.
This measurement was nearfield, as close as i could to the tweeter.
528B1CAC-3903-4477-BE86-941422CE6379.jpeg

The dip is caused by the midrange being out of phase with the tweeter.
 

thothsong

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2021
Messages
393
Go to the SPL & Phase graph for that measurement, select Mic/Meter Cal, and post a screenshot. Or post an mdat file instead.
 

thothsong

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2021
Messages
393
FWIW, here's the miniDSP cal file for my UMIK-2, trying to match your scale. Mine's down 3 dB at 20 kHz.
cal.jpg

Then again, I don't really know how much to trust it. Here's a comparison, for the same UMIK-2, between the miniDSP supplied cal file and the cal file done by Cross-Spectrum Labs:
compare.jpg
 

Robert Johansson

Registered
Thread Starter
Joined
Oct 30, 2020
Messages
14
Thanks for your replies, so you think the calibration file i use is faulty?
The one that miniDSP provides?
 

thothsong

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2021
Messages
393
I don't know what to trust, sorry Cal files are the weak link in the chain, from my perspective. But don't get too excited; at least with my UMIK-2, switching from the miniDSP cal file to the CSL cal file would pull the high frequency SPL down even further ...
 

Robert Johansson

Registered
Thread Starter
Joined
Oct 30, 2020
Messages
14
Okay, something is obviously wrong though. I have tested multiple tweeters and ALL of them drops significantly around 15kHz. And i know they dont behave that way "for real"
 

thothsong

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2021
Messages
393
I don't know anything about Macs; if you look at the system sound input settings for the mic, is there any audio processing enabled (like Use Ambient Noise Reduction) that should be disabled?
 

Robert Johansson

Registered
Thread Starter
Joined
Oct 30, 2020
Messages
14
I will look if i can find any settings that might affect the results, thank you for trying to help me.
 

sam_adams

Member
Joined
May 23, 2017
Messages
287
The .cal file contains data that is the magnitude difference from a flat frequency response. It is applied inversely to REW measurements:

caldiff.png


Make certain that you have not loaded the mic .cal file as a calibration file for your sound device. Make sure that any sound device .cal file was made with the same sample rate and bit depth that you are currently measuring with. Also, check to make absolutely certain that your sample rates and bit depths are the same for the sound device and the mic in AudioMIDISetup.app and in REW.
 

teyhyrh4r

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
56
if the cal file is falling it will actually rise the FR. it's not the cal.
I personaly have similar roloffs all the time, but I don't care for anything after 16Khz
 

Robert Johansson

Registered
Thread Starter
Joined
Oct 30, 2020
Messages
14
I constructed a wider baffle and did more measurements, looks better now.
Near field it now looks okay.
Thanks.
 

Rolledmyown

Registered
Joined
Apr 12, 2023
Messages
5
More  
Preamp, Processor or Receiver
Wadia Di122,,
Main Amp
Home made
Computer Audio
JRiver, Windows (Sony) laptop
Front Speakers
Home made, completely, except for drivers
Subwoofers
SVS PB1000
Hi folks,
I find this an interesting discussion, as I was about to post a similar question. I'm doing some tweaks to my home-made speakers. A number of years ago I bought a pair of Scan Speak D2905/930000 tweeters, which were reputed to be pretty flat in their response well beyond 25K. When I installed them I found that my Behringer 8024 Ultracurve Pro couldn't perform an GEQ on those tweeters at 20K, at which point their output was dropping like a stone. I still have those tweeters and am now using REW to attempt PEQ on my system (no longer with the Behringer installed, I use a PC with JRiver MC31,and a Wadia di122 decoder as DAC and preamp). The output from the tweeter still falls like a stone, as can be seen below (this is a near field, on axis measurement, with only the tweeter connected. By 22K the ciurve is almost vertical). I'm using a UMIK usb microphone, with the proprietary calibration file (with my Behringer I used similar but different microphone from the same manufacturer). Initially I thought that maybe I had done something awful with my home-made crossovers (e.g., a bad impedance compensation or too much padding) but following the thread here, maybe all is well and what I'm also seeing is a measurement error and I don't have to get my soldering iron out!
I've included below the manufacturer's specs for the tweeter. I'm old enough that I can't hear well above 15K so I'm sure I'm not 'missing out' when it comes to the reproduction of my speakers, but I certainly want to know if I've made a mistake in installation of my tweeters. There is plenty of baffle surrounding the tweeter, at least 4" each side and above it.
 

Attachments

  • Tweeter near field response.jpg
    Tweeter near field response.jpg
    64.8 KB · Views: 9
  • Screenshot 2023-07-18 223514.jpg
    Screenshot 2023-07-18 223514.jpg
    48.8 KB · Views: 10
Top Bottom