REW Beta Release REW API beta releases

When I select Spectrogram, first measurement shows this. Next one is OK and also the first one is OK after that. This started happening with the 103 version.
I'm guessing you have "Show slice at cursor" selected. If so, I have fixed that for the next build.
 
Builds updated today (beta 101) with these changes:
  • Changed: When the FSAF excitation for a file measurement is saved there is also an "excfilt-" file which includes the effect of any filters applied
There's about 175ms timing offset when comparing the excfilt data to the EXC or LTI data. In any case, I don't think you need to keep EXCFILT, I don't think there' much to be gained from it that isn't already in the LTI response.
 
just finished installing REW but then it redirects me to this page telling me to download but i thought I already did, do i have to do it again?
 
This is the latest beta for the next release (5.40), the current release is 5.31.3, the version on the REW website.
 
Today's Beta:
Screenshot 2025-10-22 at 11.47.44.jpg



Not responding to Key Command 'Measure"


Screenshot 2025-10-22 at 11.46.05.jpg
 
Hello,
I’m not sure if I’m the only one seeing this, but when I run a measurement the impulse response is sometimes correct and sometimes not. All the other graphs look fine. only the impulse response is affected. I’ve attached screenshots to illustrate the issue:
this is ok:
1761387085449.png


this is not (measuring the same FL speaker):
1761387131975.png


I'm using an UMIK-2.
your help is appreciated.
 
Is possible that REW 5.40 b 102 creats incorrect EQ filters on Generic Extended model?
Measurements with REW generated EQ in DSP did not fit with REW predicted response, difference is until 10 dB on some frequencies.
On my DSP configuration tool I did not see resulting response, I can only measure. How is possible to check are generated EQ correct?

REWpedictevsMeasured.PNG
 
I find on REW EQ is option "Measure with these filters" what make measurement with EQ filters applied to sweep signal, this give very close result with predicted response. So problem is somewhere in EQ filter text export and import to DSP or in DSP.
 
Do you export as text or biquad?
Is the sampling rate of the filter file export (biquads) matched to the DSP (e.g. 96 kHz, if you are using 96 in the 8C)?
 
Hello John
Running V 5.40 Beta 103. Using the Alignment Tool, I Aligned 2 sub measurement with the delay slider. The Aligned Sum Measurement is created, however its text detail is missing the msec Delay value. Shouldn't it be included, I think it use to be? Here is the text.

Alignment Sum
Impulse alignment at 24.3 Hz
A = TW11 Minidsp2x4HD MLP S1S2
B = TW11 Minidsp2x4HD MLP S3S4
B polarity was inverted

Tim
 
Do you export as text or biquad?
Is the sampling rate of the filter file export (biquads) matched to the DSP (e.g. 96 kHz, if you are using 96 in the 8C)?
EQ-s exported as text, no biquads, on DSP and on REW sampling rate is 96 kHz. If I compare EQ-s on DSP and on REW, they are exactly same, Q-s, gains and frequencies fit 100%.
 
Hi,
thanks for all the great work on this wonderful software! I am using the Beta 5.40 102 right now.
I have a question about the expected behaviour of the alignment tool:

The phase trace of the alignment tool is not affected by the "shift and update timing offset" function.
As you can see in the attached images, the timing offset of the measurement was shifted afterwards so that the phasegraph is readable, but when opening the alignment tool, the phase graph of the same measurement has all these extra phase wraps. Selecting and deselecting the Checkbox "Remove time delay" does not really make a difference, I would expect the same result as shift IR to Peak of the first measurement. The same timing offset should then be applied to the second measurement.

Maybe you can help me with this?
The .mdat file unfortunately is to lagre with 67 mb to attach here, but I can send a cloud link to it in a pm if needed.

I do also have an other wish:
The implementation of the d&b audiotechnik tuning filters is great, it makes this software much more usable in a pro audio environment.
Is it also possible to implement the filter definitions of the Powersoft Amplifiers and make it possible to import the Filtersets as .iqb directly into Armonia+, basically in the same way this is already possible with d&b R1.
I would even be happy if this is only part of the professional license, as this is something mostly professional users would need. This would be huge for me bc it is always a lot of pita to convert between the different filter definitions and keep track of which manufacturer uses which definitions.


Best
C.
 

Attachments

  • Bildschirmfoto 2025-10-27 um 01.30.32.png
    Bildschirmfoto 2025-10-27 um 01.30.32.png
    250.4 KB · Views: 11
  • Bildschirmfoto 2025-10-27 um 01.33.00.png
    Bildschirmfoto 2025-10-27 um 01.33.00.png
    554.6 KB · Views: 12
when I run a measurement the impulse response is sometimes correct and sometimes not.
Looks like a big clock rate error. In the measurement info you can see if a clock rate correction was applied, some missing data in the capture could cause an invalid correction.
 
The same timing offset should then be applied to the second measurement.
Updating the timing offset changes the offset setting on the measure dialog, it would affect measurements made after the timing offset was updated, it has no effect on existing measurements.
 
How is possible to check are generated EQ correct?
You could generate a measurement from the filter response using the option in the Filter tasks pane. It will be the same as the filter response you see in the EQ window.
 
Looks like a big clock rate error. In the measurement info you can see if a clock rate correction was applied, some missing data in the capture could cause an invalid correction.
thank you for your response. I can see 128,2 ppm for the bad one:
1761573520999.png


The good one have -34 ppm.

This problem occur more frequently. What can you recommend to prevent this ?
 
It shouldn't occur at all. There's some possibility that a strong reflection is affecting REW's estimate of the timing signal locations, though that would be unusual. You can turn off the clock rate correction in the Analysis preferences.
 
The timing reference must only come from one speaker, if it is being sent to more than one it cannot work properly.
 
There is no delay line if the delay is zero.
Hello John
Here is a screen shot of simple example. There is a delay value on the Alignment Tool screen but not in the Aligned Sum produced measurement detail. I have Attached my mdat

FYI, i uninstalled REW and its preferences and reinstalled the current beta, problem persisted
Tim

2025-10-27 (6).png
 

Attachments

Hi John,

When working with EQ filters using drag and drop method on the latest build, the "Set graph axis limits" window randomly pops up. I am not sure what triggers it.
Snap6.png
 
Back
Top