John Mulcahy
REW Author
Thread Starter
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2017
- Messages
- 7,212
There is free software that implements AES75.Another feature request, this one might be quite difficult!
Please support M-Noise measurement, according to AES75-2023
There is free software that implements AES75.Another feature request, this one might be quite difficult!
Please support M-Noise measurement, according to AES75-2023
The right hand phase aixs no longer aligning with the grid lines is awkward, though that allows much more flexibility in phase axis scaling. I'm not sure how best to manage that, but I think an extra line would not look right.For example, on the SPL tab, make the axis 0 degrees of phase 2 pixels
There is, but it has a number of limitations, mainly it’s not compatible with measurement microphones such as UMIK, and cannot be used with non-ASIO audio devices.
I've just noticed you have released another beta at the beginning of this month. I have downloaded it and will test it asap. In the meantime thank you for your amazing work and support. Enjoy the rest of the day.Are you using the latest build? It is updated frequently, the links in the first post always point to the latest build.
Thank youYes, that's why it was implemented.
Yes.
Lack of compatibility with USB mics is a consequence of the way the AES75 spec has been defined, requiring dual channel FFT processing. You could use FlexASIO as a wrapper for anything that doesn't have ASIO drivers.There is, but it has a number of limitations, mainly it’s not compatible with measurement microphones such as UMIK, and cannot be used with non-ASIO audio devices.
Thank you for your kind suggestion, I will try it !Lack of compatibility with USB mics is a consequence of the way the AES75 spec has been defined, requiring dual channel FFT processing. You could use FlexASIO as a wrapper for anything that doesn't have ASIO drivers.
Yes, two reasons:Is there a reason why one can't drag and drop .wav files into the Overlay window in Linux the same was as dragging and dropping into the main window ?
=)Yes, two reasons:
- No one has asked for it
- I haven't implemented it
The difference would typically be less than 1 in 10,000.To evaluate the difference in sampling rates between them
For sweep measurements the clock adjustment is performed for acoustic or loopback timing references if the associated Analysis preference is selected. REW can also check the clock on the RTA when playing an FFT-locked sine or a multitone signal, if the associated distorton setting is selected.Does REW always check sample rate difference if only '...with acoustic ref' is checked in 'Analysis'? For example, if the measurement is 'no timing reference'.
There isn't a way to do that, if the trace is highlighted the name is shown.How does one disable the graph name from being displayed if the graph is highlighted?
Do you have an example of an mdat file showing that?sometimes REW sets t=0 a little after the peak
That may be the correct position for t=0, again an example mdat would make it easier to comment.sometimes on the tweeter impuls graph, t=0 can be in the middle of a rise from zero to peak
Would you please consider an option to disable displaying of graph names when highlighted? On Preferences perhapsThere isn't a way to do that, if the trace is highlighted the name is shown.
Thank you JohnOK, I'll add a View preference.