Correcting FDW Reponse

tjcinnamon

Member
Thread Starter
Joined
Dec 6, 2020
Messages
123
Hi All,
What would the result of correcting Frequency Depending Windowing response vs correcting the PsychoAccoustic smoothed response?
 

John Mulcahy

REW Author
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
7,342
The FDW response should be closer to the speaker's anechoic response above the bass range.
 

tjcinnamon

Member
Thread Starter
Joined
Dec 6, 2020
Messages
123
The FDW response should be closer to the speaker's anechoic response above the bass range.
So using FDW for correcting the upper frequencies is preferred?

Also, should there be 2 sets of windows lengths for mid frequencies and then for High- frequencies?
 

John Mulcahy

REW Author
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
7,342
FDW = Frequency-Dependent Window, the window width is inversely proportional to frequency.

HF correction is best avoided or restricted to anechoic/pseudo-anechoic measurements of the speaker response if the response has some anomaly you are trying to correct.
 

teyhyrh4r

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
56
in my experience it will bring the sound "forward" since mids are emphasized. most wont like the result I rekon. but this could be only in my room.
 
Top Bottom