Matthew J Poes
AV Addict
Thread Starter
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2017
- Posts
- 1,904
Would a measurement such as IACCE3 be relevant to small room acoustics. This is measured with two microphones at a head distance apart or with a dummy head. I've interpreted this data for large room projects, but never small. My thought is that the arrival times are so short in small rooms that the difference would be small and interpretation more difficult, certainly no standards for performance spaces would apply. I know the process would be involved to measure this, but if you could incorporate dual channel capabilities and the ability to measure this, I would have use for it.
Dual channel capability would be good for other reasons, so if that could be added, it would be huge for me. Acoustics is still a hobby, but I do things at a sophisticated enough level that I need what professional software can add.
I want to be able to do in situ measurements of noise floor (so Noise Coefficient measurements) and having NC Curves would be helpful. There are a bunch of different curves now so having all of them as options would be nice. If you do add that, it would be great if it was possible to add a feature that helps people identify their microphone noise floor. For example, the umike noise floor is in the 35-50db range depending on frequency. This limits most of us to pretty basic NC measurements, but for some of us, we could utilize this capability. Realistically, most users don't have noise floors much below 40db's anyway.
I'd also like to do transmission loss measurements and again would like dual channel capability for that. If I could place one microphone in the source room and one in the receiver room, that would allow me measure the response in each space and see not just transmission loss on average but the actual transmission loss by frequency. I would find this especially helpful.
Dual channel capability would be good for other reasons, so if that could be added, it would be huge for me. Acoustics is still a hobby, but I do things at a sophisticated enough level that I need what professional software can add.
I want to be able to do in situ measurements of noise floor (so Noise Coefficient measurements) and having NC Curves would be helpful. There are a bunch of different curves now so having all of them as options would be nice. If you do add that, it would be great if it was possible to add a feature that helps people identify their microphone noise floor. For example, the umike noise floor is in the 35-50db range depending on frequency. This limits most of us to pretty basic NC measurements, but for some of us, we could utilize this capability. Realistically, most users don't have noise floors much below 40db's anyway.
I'd also like to do transmission loss measurements and again would like dual channel capability for that. If I could place one microphone in the source room and one in the receiver room, that would allow me measure the response in each space and see not just transmission loss on average but the actual transmission loss by frequency. I would find this especially helpful.