Moderator / Reviewer
- Apr 4, 2017
My AV System
- Preamp, Processor or Receiver
- Yamaha TRS-7850 Atmos Receiver
- Other Amp
- Peavy IPR 3000 for subs
- Universal / Blu-ray / CD Player
- Sony ubx800 4K UHD Player
- Front Speakers
- Cheap Thrills Mains
- Center Channel Speaker
- Cheap Thrills Center
- Surround Speakers
- Volt 10 Surrounds
- Surround Back Speakers
- Volt 10 Reach Surrounds
- Rear Height Speakers
- Volt 6 Overheads
- 2x Marty subs (full size with SI 18's)
- Video Display Device
- JVC RS-46 Projector
- Draper Cineperm M1300 119 inch Static Screen
Conan The Barbarian
Remakes of classic films are a dime a dozen these days, and many of them are quite good. However, I don’t think ANYONE really wanted a remake of the fan favorite, Conan the Barbarian. Even though Arnold was a horrible actor back then, it is widely considered to be one of his most beloved films, and fans have been screaming for old Arnold to come back as King Conan for the last decade and a half at the very LEAST. Consider the fact that Jason Momoa is not exactly considered a great actor, and the trailer looking so incredibly weak, you can understand why the 2011 remake was met with very tepid results. I have to say that I really do enjoy the film though. The 2011 version of Conan will not even come CLOSE to the awesomeness that was the old 80s cheesefest with Arnold, but it is an entertaining sword and sandal film if you like blood, guts, magic, and Jason Momoa sneering at the camera while acting about as over the top as his limited scowling version of “acting” would allow him.
Back in 1982, Conan the Barbarian made a lasting impression on cinema as a whole. It really kick started Arnold’s career, and the dark take on sword and sorcery films was forever changed. It’s kind of hard to pull off a remake when you’re comparing yourself to a legendary film, and that’s exactly what Lionsgate’s 2011 rendition was up against. Trying to remake a cult classic, and doing so with sub par actors in the leads, as well as a rather CGI laden visual style. Now I really do appreciate the way that director Marcus Nispel turned the movie into a bloody good time, but it did so at the expense of an already established set of lore and legend, and did so over the complains of a whole host of fans. Now, don’t get me wrong. I really did like the movie AS A MOVIE, but I just couldn’t come to grips with the fact that this was a Conan film. Or at least SUPPOSED to be a Conan film.
We all know the basic legend, but here it is once again. Conan (Jason Momoa) is born on the battlefield to a band of barbarian Samarian warriors. His father is slaughtered in front of his eyes by a warlord named Zym (Stephen Lang) and left orphaned. Now years later his is the head of a group of freedom fighters who loot and pillage criminals, while eating drinking and being merry. That is until Conan spies one of the warriors who accompanied Zym in the slaughter of his family. Cutting and slashing his way through minions, Conan brings himself closer and closer to avenging his parents death. When he crosses paths with a young priestess named Tamara (Rachel Nichols) that he finally has a chance to strike the heart of the serpent. Zym is after her, as she is a descendant of a long line of Asheron priests, and the warlord (now king) is desperately seeking the last of her bloodline so that he can resurrect and ancient Asheron tome in order to rule over the world as did his ancestors of old.
Rachel Nichols was a young actress, in terms of popularity, when she made this film, and her greenness shows in comparison to Continuum etc. Stephen Lang does his rough and tumble villain role well, but it’s really Rose McGowen who steals the show as Zym’s daughter, Marique. Rose had been out of the public spotlight for quite some time, but she jumped up for this one role and she was magnificently creepy as the witch daughter of the warlord. In short. Conan the Barbarian is an ok film, but just doesn’t really do much outside of a decent action movie, especially when trying to compare it to the originals (even Conan the Destroyer). A fun popcorn movie, but not much else.
Rated R for strong bloody violence, some sexuality and nudity
• A history of the Conan franchise featurette
• The Man Who Would Be Conan: Robert E. Howard featurette
• Two additional featurettes on the action and fight scenes
I was one of the few people who actually liked the 2011 Conan the Barbarian for what it was, but the movie hasn’t aged well in the six short years it has been out. I still enjoy it as a mindless popcorn action flick, but the movie really has no right to be holding onto the legendary name of Conan in any way, share, or form. The movie is ridiculous, cheesy, and filled with worse acting than even Arnold pulled off in the 80s, but still worth it as a mindless action movie if you’re anything like me. Now as for the 4K UHD upgrade? Well, that’s a bit sticky. The extras are the same ported over extras from the Blu-ray, and the video upgrade is rather minimal. Even the audio mix is not really much different than the great 7.1 mix that the Blu-ray and 3D Blu-ray had. Thus it’s one of those situations where I would say it really depends on if you HAVE to have that ever so slight video upgrade. Otherwise I would just hang on to your cheap Blu-ray copies.
Starring: Jason Momoa, Rachel Nichols, Stephen Lang, Rose McGowan
Directed by: Marcus Nispel
Written by: Thomas Dean Donnelly, Joshua Oppenheimer
Aspect Ratio: 2.40.1 HEVC
Audio: English: Dolby Atmos (Dolby TrueHD 7.1 Core)
Runtime: 113 Minutes
Blu-ray Release Date: September 19th, 2017