user44455555
Registered
Thread Starter
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2021
- Posts
- 150
Hello
It is good enough to import impulse response in rew from SPL horizontal.txt files from that page for example https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...rk-rokit-5-gen-4-review-studio-monitor.20711/
how much error % do you think have this way to see group delay ?. or is it complete wrong for bass range and can show a speaker with shorter group delay as a speaker with longer group delay ?. or maybe there can do better settings for display ?
a user on this audio science page write "From the Spinorama data published by Amir it is impossible to generate the excess phase frequency response or the complete phase frequency response of the measured speaker. So the group delay generated from the Spinorama data is not correct either - the only exception where this difference hardly matters are CB single driver full range loudspeakers."
is that true ?
rew output this
another with diffrent smoothing. values look enough for 1/24 smoothing too
It is good enough to import impulse response in rew from SPL horizontal.txt files from that page for example https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...rk-rokit-5-gen-4-review-studio-monitor.20711/
how much error % do you think have this way to see group delay ?. or is it complete wrong for bass range and can show a speaker with shorter group delay as a speaker with longer group delay ?. or maybe there can do better settings for display ?
a user on this audio science page write "From the Spinorama data published by Amir it is impossible to generate the excess phase frequency response or the complete phase frequency response of the measured speaker. So the group delay generated from the Spinorama data is not correct either - the only exception where this difference hardly matters are CB single driver full range loudspeakers."
is that true ?
rew output this
another with diffrent smoothing. values look enough for 1/24 smoothing too