Recent content by teyhyrh4r

  1. T

    FSAF (Fast subband adaptive filtering) measurement

    I think I could be this guy. Can impulses be used as a source? My first idea for a misuse would be to hear my room reverberation isolated
  2. T

    FSAF (Fast subband adaptive filtering) measurement

    I guess 5 years old is my level, since @dcibel made me understand lol thanks to both now this was very usefull, thanks
  3. T

    FSAF (Fast subband adaptive filtering) measurement

    what does "original" refer to here please?
  4. T

    Streaming services. Can you actually hear a difference? What do you listen for?

    I'm not saying that it is totally impossible to hear a difference between 320kbps aac and lossless, but if you hear a massive difference, it is most probably due to a loudness difference.
  5. T

    V5.20.14 early access build

    also when I create a MP version of that filter in order to force an IR, the sum of the measurement with that doesn't have an IR. It does have a phase though. when I click on "generate MP" in GD suddenly the IR appears but the phase is changed (near linear phase) likewise the example above.
  6. T

    V5.20.14 early access build

    Hi John, I use the latest 5-20-14 I am a little confused about the operation done in this mdat: the first graph is a meassurement the second one a target the third is a smoothed exported version of graph 1, reimported the 4th is graph 2 divided by graph 3 the 5th is the result of graph 1...
  7. T

    Umik2 falls at 14-15kHz with REW

    if the cal file is falling it will actually rise the FR. it's not the cal. I personaly have similar roloffs all the time, but I don't care for anything after 16Khz
  8. T

    EQing with the Convolution method gave me bad results, but I don't understand why...

    I am talking about correcting, amplitude and phase. I am not aware of a non-experimental aprouch of doing it in REW, and Dirac gives you very little control. Acourate software would be the state of the art for this
  9. T

    EQing with the Convolution method gave me bad results, but I don't understand why...

    ok, now watched the video. he is not creating FIR filters at all as he is simply minimum phasing his filters at the end. there is no convolution needed for this. the resulting filters can be imported as EQ in EQ-APO for example.
  10. T

    EQing with the Convolution method gave me bad results, but I don't understand why...

    I must say though that I never heard of this Serkan guy. It's the guy from the video, yes? I will have a look
  11. T

    EQing with the Convolution method gave me bad results, but I don't understand why...

    Experimental I call the aprouch to create FIR filters in REW, since I am not aware of this beeing a standard aprouch. I myself have studied Denis Sbragion's documentation https://drc-fir.sourceforge.net/doc/drc.html#sec36 for 12 years now and still have a hard time doing it in REW. it's a lot of...
  12. T

    EQing with the Convolution method gave me bad results, but I don't understand why...

    naaah, you dont need it. If you are at the beginning of this journey you really shouldn't mess with this. this is experimental territory, let me phrase it like this
  13. T

    EQing with the Convolution method gave me bad results, but I don't understand why...

    I am playing around with inversion for weeks now and it's very complicated. the main reason is the phase. you can't simple invert the phase, even with regularization. I will post my findings soon in a nother forum, could post here to if there is intrest. So far I can tell you, if you are not...
  14. T

    Correcting FDW Reponse

    in my experience it will bring the sound "forward" since mids are emphasized. most wont like the result I rekon. but this could be only in my room.
Back
Top