Room Correction... yes. Microphone... no!

1_sufferin_mind

Active Member
Supporter
Thread Starter
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
494
Location
Indianapolis
More  
Preamp, Processor or Receiver
Emotiva XMC-2
Main Amp
Emotiva XPA-5
Additional Amp
McCormack DNA-1 Custom Monoblocks (On Standby)
Other Amp
Woo Audio WA6se w/ Audeze LCD-2
Universal / Blu-ray / CD Player
Oppo BDP-95
Front Speakers
Revel Ultima Salon
Center Channel Speaker
Revel Voice
Surround Speakers
PSB Image B5
Subwoofers
Seaton Sound Submersive F2+/- pair
Other Speakers or Equipment
Cary SLP98P / VPI SuperScout with JMW9 & Hana MH
Video Display Device
LG 65" OLED 65CX
Screen
TBD
Streaming Subscriptions
JVC X70R Proj ; PS Audio PWD w/ Streaming Bridge
Linn includes a room correction system called Space Optimisation which does not use a micropone. Instead, the user enters room dimensions and any acoustic features like
Enter the room dimensions into our on-screen tool—running on any computer or laptop—along with the construction type and any features, such as windows and doors that will affect the sound. Select your make and model of speakers, enter their location and where you’ll be sitting, and Space Optimisation will do the rest.
According to their literature,

Space Optimisation creates an exceptionally detailed acoustic model of the room, then taking account of the specific characteristics of your speakers, it identifies exactly how to deliver the best sound to you.

The correction profile is then stored in the particular Linn audio product being used. And if your setup is less than ideal, Space Optimisation can compensate:
The acoustic model takes into account your chosen practical position for your speakers, and emulates the sound that you would have heard in the ideal location.

It's probably a long shot but do you have, or do you know anyone who has, personal experience with this room correction tool?
Do you think Space Optimisation could be as effective as Audyssey XT32 or Dirac Live - or for any microphone-based tool?
 

Todd Anderson

Editor / Senior Admin
Staff member
Joined
Jan 20, 2017
Messages
9,140
Location
Balt/Wash Metro
More  
Preamp, Processor or Receiver
StormAudio ISP.24 MK2
Main Amp
Emotiva XPA-5
Additional Amp
Emotiva XPA Gen3 2.8 multichannel amp
Other Amp
Denon X8500H
Computer Audio
AudioEngine A2+
DAC
THX ONYX
Universal / Blu-ray / CD Player
Kaleidescape TERRA, OPPO UDP-203, Panasonic UB9000
Front Speakers
GoldenEar Technology Triton One.R
Center Channel Speaker
GoldenEar Technology SuperCenter Reference
Surround Speakers
SVS Ultra Surround
Surround Back Speakers
SVS Ultra Bookshelf
Front Height Speakers
SVS Prime Elevation x4 (Top Front, Top Mid-Front)
Rear Height Speakers
SVS Prime Elevation x4 (Top Middle, Top Rear)
Subwoofers
dual SVS SB16s + dual PSA XS30s
Other Speakers or Equipment
Behringer 1124p; Aura Bass Shaker Pros; SuperSub X
Video Display Device
JVC NX7
Screen
Seymour Screen Excellence, Enlightor NEO AT Screen
Streaming Equipment
iFi Audio Zen Blue
Streaming Subscriptions
Qobuz, TIDAL, Spotify, ROON
Other Equipment
LG Electronics 65-inch B6 OLED, Sony 65-inch X900F, ZeroSurge 8R15W x 2, ZeroSurge 2R15W x 2
I don't know anyone that's used something like that... theoretically it makes sense, but eliminating real world measurement bothers. Then again, using the cheap microphones manufacturers supply with their AVRs bothers me too...
 
L

Leonard Caillouet

Guest
I think it is a faulty idea. There are too many variables in real rooms for something like that to be really effective. I can't imagine it being consistently effective.
 

tesseract

Senior Admin
Joined
Nov 12, 2016
Messages
1,266
Location
Lincoln, NE
More  
Preamp, Processor or Receiver
Emotiva XMC-1
Main Amp
Emotiva XPA-2 Gen 2
Additional Amp
Emotiva XPA-3 Gen 2
Other Amp
Dayton SA1000
Universal / Blu-ray / CD Player
Sony BDP S590 & Pioneer DV-610AV
Front Speakers
JTR NOESIS 210 RT - L/R mains
Center Channel Speaker
Chase SHO-10 - Center
Surround Speakers
Chase PRO-10 - Surrounds
Subwoofers
Chase VS-18.1 x 2 - Subwoofers
Video Display Device
Vizio E550VL
Streaming Subscriptions
h/k TC35C/Ortofon Super OM10/Pro-Ject Phono Box S
I agree with Leonard. The Linn method seems very rough, dealing only with remote projected EQ fixes that do not deal with distance setting or impulse in any useful fashion.
 

1_sufferin_mind

Active Member
Supporter
Thread Starter
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
494
Location
Indianapolis
More  
Preamp, Processor or Receiver
Emotiva XMC-2
Main Amp
Emotiva XPA-5
Additional Amp
McCormack DNA-1 Custom Monoblocks (On Standby)
Other Amp
Woo Audio WA6se w/ Audeze LCD-2
Universal / Blu-ray / CD Player
Oppo BDP-95
Front Speakers
Revel Ultima Salon
Center Channel Speaker
Revel Voice
Surround Speakers
PSB Image B5
Subwoofers
Seaton Sound Submersive F2+/- pair
Other Speakers or Equipment
Cary SLP98P / VPI SuperScout with JMW9 & Hana MH
Video Display Device
LG 65" OLED 65CX
Screen
TBD
Streaming Subscriptions
JVC X70R Proj ; PS Audio PWD w/ Streaming Bridge
Should I be skeptical as well? On one hand, my inner lazy-self wants to believe. Less work for me. But on the other hand, Linn offers no scientific explanation to back their hype. That could very well be because they're merely protecting their intellectual property. In stark contrast, Dirac has no such reservations, and has published at least one paper detailing their scientific approach.

I have trouble visualizing how Linn's Space Optimisation can best similar room-modeling algorithms. While it accounts for subtleties such as construction materials and speaker models, how could it possibly be specific enough to account for varied materials and open floor plans? They could maybe get my buy-in if other proven software existed.
 
L

Leonard Caillouet

Guest
It does not deal with the real world variables in favor of pre-defined assumptions. I just don't see what value there is in this.
 

Sonnie

Senior Admin
Staff member
Joined
Apr 2, 2017
Messages
5,055
Location
Alabama
More  
Preamp, Processor or Receiver
StormAudio ISP Elite 24 MK3 Processor
Main Amp
McIntosh MC1.25KW Monoblock Amps
Additional Amp
StormAudio PA 16 MK3
Computer Audio
Intel NUC w/ Roon ROCK
Universal / Blu-ray / CD Player
Panasonic UB9000 4K UHD Player (for media discs)
Front Speakers
RTJ 410
Center Channel Speaker
MartinLogan Focus C-18
Front Wide Speakers
JTR Neosis 110HT
Surround Speakers
JTR Neosis 210RT
Surround Back Speakers
JTR Neosis 210RT
Front Height Speakers
JTR Neosis 110HT-SL
Rear Height Speakers
JTR Neosis 110HT-SL
Subwoofers
JTR Captivator 2400 x6
Other Speakers or Equipment
VTI Amp Stands for the Monoblocks
Video Display Device
Sony 98X90L
Remote Control
Universal MX-890
Streaming Equipment
FireCube for movies and Lenova Carbon X1 for Roon
Streaming Subscriptions
Lifetime Roon Subscription
Tidal
qobuz
Netflix
Amazon Prime
Satellite System
Dish Joey 4K
Other Equipment
Zero Surge 8R15W-1 | Salamander Synergy Equipment Stand
I suspect the only ones you'll ever get to tell you that this system works is someone working for Linn (naturally)... or someone reviewing their product in a big name magazine. I don't think they would let me review it. And I would be literally stunned to the utmost degree if it even came close to working. Can they take into account openings in the room, how large those openings are, how large the adjoining room is that is thru that opening, odd shaped rooms, reflections, acoustic panels (thickness, size and location of each), furniture (soft finished and any hard surfaces), carpet or hard flooring, wall material, ceiling material, windows, wood blinds and/or cloth curtains, glass and/or pictures on the walls, distance of speakers from the front wall, side walls, ceiling and listener... and then data for every speaker available? It ain't gonna happen... they are living in a dream world.
 

tesseract

Senior Admin
Joined
Nov 12, 2016
Messages
1,266
Location
Lincoln, NE
More  
Preamp, Processor or Receiver
Emotiva XMC-1
Main Amp
Emotiva XPA-2 Gen 2
Additional Amp
Emotiva XPA-3 Gen 2
Other Amp
Dayton SA1000
Universal / Blu-ray / CD Player
Sony BDP S590 & Pioneer DV-610AV
Front Speakers
JTR NOESIS 210 RT - L/R mains
Center Channel Speaker
Chase SHO-10 - Center
Surround Speakers
Chase PRO-10 - Surrounds
Subwoofers
Chase VS-18.1 x 2 - Subwoofers
Video Display Device
Vizio E550VL
Streaming Subscriptions
h/k TC35C/Ortofon Super OM10/Pro-Ject Phono Box S
A simple summation of the Linn method is, it is a guess.
 

Sonnie

Senior Admin
Staff member
Joined
Apr 2, 2017
Messages
5,055
Location
Alabama
More  
Preamp, Processor or Receiver
StormAudio ISP Elite 24 MK3 Processor
Main Amp
McIntosh MC1.25KW Monoblock Amps
Additional Amp
StormAudio PA 16 MK3
Computer Audio
Intel NUC w/ Roon ROCK
Universal / Blu-ray / CD Player
Panasonic UB9000 4K UHD Player (for media discs)
Front Speakers
RTJ 410
Center Channel Speaker
MartinLogan Focus C-18
Front Wide Speakers
JTR Neosis 110HT
Surround Speakers
JTR Neosis 210RT
Surround Back Speakers
JTR Neosis 210RT
Front Height Speakers
JTR Neosis 110HT-SL
Rear Height Speakers
JTR Neosis 110HT-SL
Subwoofers
JTR Captivator 2400 x6
Other Speakers or Equipment
VTI Amp Stands for the Monoblocks
Video Display Device
Sony 98X90L
Remote Control
Universal MX-890
Streaming Equipment
FireCube for movies and Lenova Carbon X1 for Roon
Streaming Subscriptions
Lifetime Roon Subscription
Tidal
qobuz
Netflix
Amazon Prime
Satellite System
Dish Joey 4K
Other Equipment
Zero Surge 8R15W-1 | Salamander Synergy Equipment Stand
A simple summation of the Linn method is, it is a guess.

lol... that's a good one. Is that the same as an estimation?

Who's guess is it you reckon?
 

tesseract

Senior Admin
Joined
Nov 12, 2016
Messages
1,266
Location
Lincoln, NE
More  
Preamp, Processor or Receiver
Emotiva XMC-1
Main Amp
Emotiva XPA-2 Gen 2
Additional Amp
Emotiva XPA-3 Gen 2
Other Amp
Dayton SA1000
Universal / Blu-ray / CD Player
Sony BDP S590 & Pioneer DV-610AV
Front Speakers
JTR NOESIS 210 RT - L/R mains
Center Channel Speaker
Chase SHO-10 - Center
Surround Speakers
Chase PRO-10 - Surrounds
Subwoofers
Chase VS-18.1 x 2 - Subwoofers
Video Display Device
Vizio E550VL
Streaming Subscriptions
h/k TC35C/Ortofon Super OM10/Pro-Ject Phono Box S

Lanion

New Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
14
More  
Preamp, Processor or Receiver
Marantz 7005
Main Amp
Outlaw Audio 7900
Additional Amp
Emotiva XPA-2
Other Amp
Outlaw RR2150
Universal / Blu-ray / CD Player
Playstation 4
Front Speakers
ATX A5
Center Channel Speaker
Outlaw LCR
Surround Speakers
Polk Audio LSiFX
Front Height Speakers
Polk Audio LSi7
Subwoofers
HSU ULS15 x 2
Other Speakers or Equipment
Buttkicker LFE
Video Display Device
Vizio
It does not deal with the real world variables in favor of pre-defined assumptions. I just don't see what value there is in this.

Interestingly, it relies heavily upon listening data. You must enter in the ideal location for your speakers for it to generate EQ for where your speakers actually are. It seems like you have to make up an ideal position for in-ceiling speakers.

I found this video on youtube. It shows the interface.

I also found this 53 page setup guide, which I just read all of...


The most interesting tidbit is that the user/installer can enter in where the ideal speaker position is based on their ears and where the speakers have to be for practical reasons. So, there is some real world input that goes through the software. Interesting idea for someone who is not very technical to set it up.

It also has software like REW's room simulator and allows for a lot of parametric EQ in the settings, which you would really need measurements for to put in anything sensible for high freqeuencies. It allows for simulation of room modes for bass eq.


My take is that Linn's approach is simpler and harder to mess up for someone who doesn't know what they are doing. There is no way someone can over-EQ based on one mic measurement taken in non-ideal circumstances. I wouldn't want potential customers getting a bad impression of my product because someone misunderstood how to use auto-calibration properly. I don't know what the average Linn buyer is like, but maybe this is effective marketing and differentiates Linn as being more 'pure'.
 

Mike-48

Member
Joined
May 27, 2019
Messages
147
Location
Portland, Oregon, USA
I think it is a faulty idea. There are too many variables in real rooms for something like that to be really effective. I can't imagine it being consistently effective.

That, precisely.

I've not had experience with the Linn method, but (like many of us, I assume), I've calculated expected acoustics performance from room dimensions and major features and then actually measured acoustic performance in the room. They have never agreed! As an acoustician pointed out to me, even walls are not absolute -- the relevant acoustic dimension may be around the center of a frame-constructed wall. It may be at the outer (concrete) wall of a finished basement. That's just the simple stuff! Then factor in the effects of furniture, and such a method is almost certain (IMO) to fail.
 

Kakkadu

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2018
Messages
61
I agree with Leonard. The Linn method seems very rough, dealing only with remote projected EQ fixes that do not deal with distance setting or impulse in any useful fashion.
The wall construction alone makes a critical difference. If you have a building with wooden walls, it requires completely different corrections compared to a concrete walled one.
 
Top Bottom