REW Beta Release REW 5.20 beta 44 Stack Overflow error on linux Raspbian

Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 8, 2018
Messages
279
Location
Italy
Hi, I installed the latest beta of REW on Raspbian linux on Raspberry Pi 3+ hardware and continually presents me with this error before making the measurements.
The previous beta worked correctly.

Regards
Antonio

REW V5.20 Beta 44 running JRE 1.8.0_221 32-bit on linux 4.19.75-v7+, it, UTF-8


Message:
java.lang.StackOverflowError
Stack Trace:
sun.misc.FloatingDecimal$BinaryToASCIIBuffer.dtoa(FloatingDecimal.java:431)
sun.misc.FloatingDecimal$BinaryToASCIIBuffer.access$100(FloatingDecimal.java:259)
sun.misc.FloatingDecimal.getBinaryToASCIIConverter(FloatingDecimal.java:1785)
sun.misc.FloatingDecimal.getBinaryToASCIIConverter(FloatingDecimal.java:1738)
java.text.DigitList.set(DigitList.java:291)
java.text.DecimalFormat.format(DecimalFormat.java:621)
java.text.DecimalFormat.format(DecimalFormat.java:544)
java.text.NumberFormat.format(NumberFormat.java:296)
roomeqwizard.UH.B(y:1377)
roomeqwizard.UH.A(y:2727)
roomeqwizard.MC$1.stateChanged(y:2978)
javax.swing.JSpinner.fireStateChanged(JSpinner.java:458)
javax.swing.JSpinner$ModelListener.stateChanged(JSpinner.java:386)
javax.swing.AbstractSpinnerModel.fireStateChanged(AbstractSpinnerModel.java:119)
roomeqwizard.MD.setValue(y:1058)
javax.swing.JSpinner.setValue(JSpinner.java:354)
roomeqwizard.MC.propertyChange(y:2682)
java.beans.PropertyChangeSupport.fire(PropertyChangeSupport.java:335)
java.beans.PropertyChangeSupport.firePropertyChange(PropertyChangeSupport.java:327)
javax.swing.event.SwingPropertyChangeSupport.firePropertyChange(SwingPropertyChangeSupport.java:92)
java.beans.PropertyChangeSupport.firePropertyChange(PropertyChangeSupport.java:263)
java.beans.PropertyChangeSupport.firePropertyChange(PropertyChangeSupport.java:283)
roomeqwizard.UH.C(y:3344)
roomeqwizard.UH.A(y:825)
roomeqwizard.MC$1.stateChanged(y:2978)
 

Attachments

  • REW_5.20_beta44_error.zip
    57.2 KB · Views: 2
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 8, 2018
Messages
279
Location
Italy
Ok John, beta 45 works well the problem has been resolved. There remains only a small thing that I think can be improved, during the calibration of the impedance it is quite uncomfortable that you close the measurement window at each step, it would be more convenient if it remained open to continue the other phases until the end of the whole procedure.

Thanks John
 
Top Bottom