Keith_W
Member
Hi John, I went to my friend's place yesterday to take some measurements of his listening room. I brought along my laptop, my Focusrite 2i2, and an XLR microphone. Unfortunately, I only have XLR outputs, and he does not have XLR inputs on his AVR. So I decided to take an offline measurement.
There were more issues with the offline measurement. My ancient Focusrite can only use a 48kHz sampling rate, and his ancient AVR can only use 44.1kHz FLAC files. So I generated a 44.1kHz 1M sweep with timing chirp, converted it to FLAC using JRiver and gave it to him, and a 48kHz 1M sweep with timing chirp which I loaded into REW.
This was the result (MDAT uploaded):
Clearly this was a nonsense measurement. Nothing I tried could remedy the situation. I don't think it was feedback from the microphone either.
Just FYI the same measurement setup was able to successfully take measurements a week previously, although that time I did not have to take an offline measurement since the other system was able to accept XLR inputs.
I am wondering whether a 44.1kHz 1M playback and a 48kHz 1M reference are substantially different enough to produce this kind of result.
There were more issues with the offline measurement. My ancient Focusrite can only use a 48kHz sampling rate, and his ancient AVR can only use 44.1kHz FLAC files. So I generated a 44.1kHz 1M sweep with timing chirp, converted it to FLAC using JRiver and gave it to him, and a 48kHz 1M sweep with timing chirp which I loaded into REW.
This was the result (MDAT uploaded):
Clearly this was a nonsense measurement. Nothing I tried could remedy the situation. I don't think it was feedback from the microphone either.
Just FYI the same measurement setup was able to successfully take measurements a week previously, although that time I did not have to take an offline measurement since the other system was able to accept XLR inputs.
I am wondering whether a 44.1kHz 1M playback and a 48kHz 1M reference are substantially different enough to produce this kind of result.




