giacomus
New Member
Thread Starter
				
				
					
						- Joined
- Nov 13, 2024
- Posts
- 7
More  
				
					
						
						
							
	
		
			
			
				
			
			
		
		
	- Preamp, Processor or Receiver
- Classe CP-800
- Main Amp
- Classe CA-2200
- Additional Amp
- Classe CA-2200
- DAC
- Bryston BDA-2
- Computer Audio
- Intel NUC
- Streaming Subscriptions
- Qobuz
- Front Speakers
- B&W 801 Nautilus
- Cables
- Van Den Hul Supernova
 Audioquest Yukon, etc..
Hello!Exporting impulse response to a wav file, and selecting the 48k and 192k sample rates, the two output filter files have very different gains:
48k version:
> sox FLX+2dB-trimmed-48k.wav -n stats
DC offset 0.000008
Min level -0.738194
Max level 0.337055
Pk lev dB -2.64
RMS lev dB -51.17
RMS Pk dB -40.70
RMS Tr dB -189.96
Crest factor 267.25
Flat factor 0.00
Pk count 2
Bit-depth 32/32
Num samples 131k
Length s 2.731
Scale max 1.000000
Window s 0.050
192k version:
> sox FLX+2dB-trimmed-192k.wav -n stats
DC offset 0.000002
Min level -0.184549
Max level 0.127396
Pk lev dB -14.68
RMS lev dB -63.28
RMS Pk dB -52.80
RMS Tr dB -204.69
Crest factor 269.10
Flat factor 0.00
Pk count 2
Bit-depth 30/32
Num samples 524k
Length s 2.731
Scale max 1.000000
Window s 0.050
There is a difference of more than 10dB
Is this expected? Is it an effect of the resample algorithm?
With regards
Giacomo
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			48k version:
> sox FLX+2dB-trimmed-48k.wav -n stats
DC offset 0.000008
Min level -0.738194
Max level 0.337055
Pk lev dB -2.64
RMS lev dB -51.17
RMS Pk dB -40.70
RMS Tr dB -189.96
Crest factor 267.25
Flat factor 0.00
Pk count 2
Bit-depth 32/32
Num samples 131k
Length s 2.731
Scale max 1.000000
Window s 0.050
192k version:
> sox FLX+2dB-trimmed-192k.wav -n stats
DC offset 0.000002
Min level -0.184549
Max level 0.127396
Pk lev dB -14.68
RMS lev dB -63.28
RMS Pk dB -52.80
RMS Tr dB -204.69
Crest factor 269.10
Flat factor 0.00
Pk count 2
Bit-depth 30/32
Num samples 524k
Length s 2.731
Scale max 1.000000
Window s 0.050
There is a difference of more than 10dB
Is this expected? Is it an effect of the resample algorithm?
With regards
Giacomo
 
	





 
  
 
		
 
  
  
  
  
  
 