Recent content by Ofer

I had similar issues. For me an improvement in room treatment, qrd diffusesers+spacing from the wall of the early reflection panels, improved the time domain of the sound. Then I could let up full TTD and move to minimal xo with with partial correction. For music that has many instruments or is...

I am not a 100% sure what you mean. But you could make several measurements and have AL average the response. As for the curve, I am not aware of a way to upload a curve via text file or something like that. At any rate it is usually advisable to have the curve run (hug) close to your actual...

Is you system fully active or passive? What type of filters did you try? TTD, minimal XO, FR only? did you try partial correction? Is your room treated? Is there a sub in the system? In my experience the more the room is acoustically treated the less the filter power you need. Try using less...

Why is left full range and right small?

There is a help file. That is as close as you get to a user manual. I am not sure if it is readily available for download.

Can you post a picture of your target before correction?

Good thing you didn't blow a driver because of this. Seems like Motu decided to imitate the RME user (un)friendly interface :)

Yes

This might not be connected but try to cross the sub at 80 and 80.1hz. Sometimes this sets things right when offloading to the sub.

Looks like the crossover is at ~60hz. Kind of makes sense as this is where you base hump start to drop. Meaning that the sub outputs more SPL than your bookshelves. If you like this ~15db base boost from 30-90hz (aprox) than keep it and tame it with AL, as you did. You could also decrease the...

OK. That explains the extension to 30hz. From the picture it seems that the sub is almost on the same plain as the speakers. That is why you probably get a relatively nice step response. What frequency is are the sub and the speakers crossed?

The measurements you post, the sub is playing in those measurements?

Nice, I see you are reluctant to add the sub. Can understand, or am I missing something?

Yeah it looks good. I recommend giving each new procedure another name. That way it would be easier for you to play with them. Also a quick sanity check. You placed the mic exactly between the speakers? After the measurement you should aspire to 0.05ms between speakers.

Ok. Looks good. Glad to hear it sounds good too. Did you try a mixed target curve? You can try to follow the decline you have in the top end with the target. Or introduce a downward tilt like from -15db you have in 90hz to -15@20khz. These are just suggestions for you to try. What I meant in...