Recent content by juicehifi

And 1 ms equals 48 samples if you measure at 48 kHz

The first is higher than the second. Which is typical since the first is closer. But you need to find out whether the measured delay matches the difference in distance. 34 cm equals 1 ms…

This looks like one of the speakers actually is inverted. You can try to flip left and right out of the sound card. If the two speakers switch behavior something is wrong here … glitches in the Audio stream.

If the microphone is properly centered, the delay difference should be inside 1-2 ms.

Yes, you’re right. I was a bit quick. The simulation shows the combo of speaker and sub. If you want to see the actual crossovers you should look at the correction filters. Anyway, the sumulation soes that the integration is very good.

You should do this on the speaker tab, not the xo tab. Currently the bass offloading frequency is set to 250 Hz. So just change it to 70 Hz.

If you downlad Audiolense and start i (as a demo) you will see that Audiolense supports literally any format. The only limit is max 128 channels / speakers.

Try to visit the correction procedure designer.

You most likely need a larger correction window in the bass.

Yes, there,s a chanche, but not a certainty. I’ve done some preparations with the data structures, but I haven’t quite figured out how to implement it in a way thay I like and that fits in with the hands-on approach in Audiolense. And furthermore I am not yet convinced that the solutions...

It will be the one that has the highest spl in some frequency. If your sub causes clipping it’s either the microphone or the ad converter that clips.

¡De nada!

2.1 and 2.2 is usually stereo with one or two subs. Then you pull «triphonic» out of your hat. I googled triphonic and got maybe 5-6 different answers. Right now you sound like you have an agenda, not a question.

Triphonic?

Where did you get this from? Those have been there since Audiolense was launched in 2007, together with a bunch of others and custom options.