Recent content by FargateOne

my version is 5.31.3 . I should have mentionned it. No big deal.

Hi John, I am again trying to prove that Arcam can't implement Dirac in their receivers. Today I see that in the info of REW measurement. My laptop is on Win11 and the info shows Win10. What do I miss? I can sleep with that but just in case it could be important against Harman Luxury...

I had the exact same problem as long as I was with Win10. Now in Win 11 I have the same 5.1 system and I can choose channel 5-6 or 7-8 for surrounds (if this help!) The weird thing is with Win 10 or Win 11 if REW is open with the receiver disconnected, Front left and Front right name return to L...

For those it may concern also it seems that Dirac much prefers a 48kHz active input connection when measuring than an analogue 44.1kHz.

Stupid question here: Is API REW version means that we don't need a hdmi cable between the laptop and the avr?

and help! Thanks.

Hi sir, final report. I returned the laptop to get an other one. Umik-2 + good usb connection + setting 2channels 24 bits 48000Hz inWin11 works like a charm! Thanks It confirms dead of the old mic! BTW DLBC can reverse polarities of the satellites! Dirac measurements confirmed the fact that my...

It was after 9 points measurements. Didn't trust it. I did an other run (I forgot to print screen mic level. I had -6.5dB for the loudest speaker and set it the same trim with the subs sliders and I turn up the vol in amp plate of the subs to get 5dB above the 24,9dB level of the others...

Flax said yesterday to set Umik-2 sample rate at 48KHz for Dirac so now 2 channels 24 bits 48KHz new round with those mic levels: (followd markus767 melhau mic level to the T sub slider match the loudest speaker) and I turn up amp plate subs level to get 4 dB higher than others Here...

It is why you see -16.9dB in sub channels for the same slider leve as the satellites at -5.0dB. Maybe you will find interesting to know tha with the old Umik-1 for more than 3 years of DLBC calculations, I always have had th following default target curve: And with Umik-2 and all others...

With Umik-1 I always had this 4dB headroom as shownd in #41 first image. I was thinking that I could have the same headroom with Umik-2 but where trims for the satellites and for the subs are reversed...by the same dBs. Yes but Umik-1 and Umik-2 results are for the new position of the left sub...

Thanks those are best practices followed religiously. since 10 years with the old mic when a couple of weeks ago it give the spike at 60Hz all of a sudden. FTI the miniusb connection on the back of the old mic was on a round plat that we could turn out to open the internal hardware of the mic...

Report.. AVR main vol at 56. GREEN = Umik-1 Center 2 subs off DLBC xo92 on RED = Umik-2 Center 2 subs off DLBC xo92 on The SPL difference comes from we saw above in the Umik-2 trims in Arcam AVR21. The 2 subs Center disconnected DLBC xo92 on BLUE = Umik-1 ORANGE = Umik-2 So the new...

Neither do I to be honest! Yes he had one of my 1 000,000,0...mdat files

I sure have a lot.To test it should I : @markus is back in AVSForum. During the investigation into DLBC above v3.4.4 and following Markus' instructions, he commented one day that my sub measurements were missing 6dB at the time, https://www.avsforum.com/posts/63189067/ I wonder if the Umik-2...