Can you measure it using REW? Play with the smoothing........how narrow is it? Is it on individual speaker measurements? Is you ceiling plasterboard or frame with perforated plaster tiles?
IMO Loopback is not necessary. Way down the line if you need it for particular precision work, you will know.
The popular USB Mics cannot provide Loopback. The PMIK-1 did and I believe the little MicW has a splitter which will make it happen...
I don't usually do this myself, I just send a Sweep Wav to Remote Clients. But I intend to shortly, after I do a new Dirac Live Setup using an NTI 2230 Lab quality mic! The sweep file is generated by REW, or FuzzMeasure. Import the WAV or AIFF into any DAW and play normally. Record. Present...
ProTools has never played nice with other interfaces or the OS. John's solution of Playing Back a Sweep and Recording the Speakers and Room should work nicely. I do this with Remote Clients.
ProTools was originally a Mac Program...... Your task looks overwhelming to me. I have never bothered to try to measure my rig with Dirac Live included. Although I am curious.... now that you mention it....
Tx. Every day I wake up and look at myself in the mirror, shaving, and say. " Am I an Artist?" I am convinced that Immersion can be created in the Playback Rig.
I love Dirac, use it every day in the Studio. But for Measuring REW. Here is what happens when the Measuring Mic is not precisely central. Comb filtering destroys the HF.
A single graph of Frequency Response is a bit suspect. Unless the mic is perfectly central in a perfectly acoustically symmetrical room, there will be HF comb filtering. Flat is tilted about 6dB brighter than the average measured listeners room.
Many have pointed out that these Historic Works of Art are, well, Historically signficant. The Work is the sum of the parts. Replacing some of those parts/people to create new mixes seems wrong to me , even if better in some aspects...
Wow. Drummers use such technology, maybe some Cinemas, but I never thought of it for home use. I doubt that whatever transducer would need to be particularly liner or under the control of Dirac. I reckon a simple crossover allowing only sub sub would suffice. Are there such tactile transducers...
Brilliant, thank you. 16:00 here in Ireland. Mathias is a very nice fella. He has been really helpful to me in getting the best out of DL in a Pro Studio environment.
That sounds very interesting, nice on Todd. A Specsavers moment perhaps, but what time is that happening? Edit, I just saw a red 16:10 on the FaceBook page. What Time Zone?
DD
Why not do normal sweep measurements. I did this with a vintage Radford STA15 Valve Amplifier. The Frequency Response Graphs were stunningly good. Distortion was reassuringly very low. This data help sell it for a small fortune. It was simple Line I/O on an iMac
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.