Recent content by twelti76

It would be a nice option to be able to retain the captured data. I find it useful sometimes. I don't think my current laptop would break a sweat, storage-wise. Might not be that trivial to code though I guess.

Good point, it just looks different. Surprising how much!

Is there any reason a "Filtered IR" with no filters selected/enabled should look different than the regular IR?

Ah, that does sound familiar now that you mention it. Thanks.

I haven't often looked at the "Captured" data. Seems like when I do there is nothing there. I've zoomed in/out to full exents, don't see anything. The measurement itself (transfer function) looks fine, just some excessive pre-ringing on one measurement, and I was curious to see the raw data...

Nevermind! Looks like it was fixed in the last release.

I do a lot of opening and saving files. One thing always bugs me. The default column width for file name is too small. I find myself CONSTANTLY expanding it so I can read the file name each time. I assume it would be fairly trivial to increase the default width...? maybe remove the file...

A great fix would be to link all the paths for all the different import/export save/load functions, of which there are a LOT. So that way when I move to a new task/project, I don't have to keep changing each and every path. I change to a new path for one task, like loading a new file, and all...

Yes that is a good idea. I wasn't thinking about using these measurements in this way when I made them. Anotherr way to get around this could be to band pass the IR. I have done this before. Of course, that won't fix the issue of the window being in the wrong place! I wonder if there might...

Thanks, I've been lurking for a while, saving up a few worms!

That IS weird! I made those A/B trace arithmetic plots all at the same time, one after the other. The windows for the source measurements are all the same. I wonder how the heck that window got goobered up then? It looks like maybe in that particular A/B, the artifact that shows up outside...

and the file attached...

Maybe this is a good place to dump my can of worms! I have tried using the A/B several times recently. In most of these instances, I wanted to divide out a near field measurement from an in-room measurement, to normalize and remove the effect of the source. I seem to get very erratic results...

I'm having trouble aligning 2 measurements. Actually I have 3 measurements. One is a nearfield meas of a subwoofer. The other two are in opposite corners of the room. One of the corner measurements aligns fine with the reference nearfield measurement, the other one not so much. The second...

YEAAAA! You read my mind.