Recent content by TNT

If you don't live in the countryside but in a flat in a town and you did these at at time of day when there is traffic outside this is noting strange at all. It looks fine. The variations ar not very large. If you want better you need a proper lab environment. Variations between 15 seconds...

OK - understand. //

OK, the by REW supplied Java machine. Possible to tweak? //

But not on my machine it seems..

Aha - ok - thanks! //

Hallo! Is it possible to control the format of the date in the red circle as per the attached screen grab? I have set all other to 24 hour clock formats but I cant find this one... BR // PS. The cookie adventure to enter this site and forum is first the smaller "standard" choice but also...

May I be so bold to suggest this as a new Arithmetic feature? //

Is it possible to make one in a series of measurements "normal" and see the rest of the measurement adopt the difference to the normal? //

That escaped me - thanks. //

Actually it was. But eventually I found out, But why do a normally gifted person have to dig deep into pane specific menus to find an import function? Quite poor UX. Buts thats a rePhase "issue". How about the Save vs. Export use in REW. I'm of course grateful that this work at all - thanks...

Thanks! Yes, I started to realise this. Now, doing EQ and generating filters with AutoEQ with rePhase set as target, using the option "Save filter setting to file" generates an .xml file but I cant get rePhase to open that.. is it intended to work? What is really the difference between...

If I have a measurement (SPL and Phase tab) that was generated from an EQ session with filters and I try to do Export the filter settings as "formatted text" or as "text", I get a table with zeros in both cases. But I see in the left pane that the in the bottom info area for the particular...

I hope I'm correct in that: FR trace linearity is not important as the "krocket" stimuli is the same for all measurements. The stimuli has gone through signal processing as it is excited by my DSP active 2-way stereo system - using only one channel at the time for measurements! But, should it...

I do my calibration trials with substitution method. I place the ref 40 cm from the source and mark the tip of the mic very careful with a thin thread with a knot hanging from the roof. Do a sweep and record with the reference mic. Then place the mic to be calibrated in the exact same position...

OK - so I need to redo the measuremnts with the FR compensations in place and then do phase corrections on these... right!? //