Recent content by TNT

May I be so bold to suggest this as a new Arithmetic feature? //

Is it possible to make one in a series of measurements "normal" and see the rest of the measurement adopt the difference to the normal? //

That escaped me - thanks. //

Actually it was. But eventually I found out, But why do a normally gifted person have to dig deep into pane specific menus to find an import function? Quite poor UX. Buts thats a rePhase "issue". How about the Save vs. Export use in REW. I'm of course grateful that this work at all - thanks...

Thanks! Yes, I started to realise this. Now, doing EQ and generating filters with AutoEQ with rePhase set as target, using the option "Save filter setting to file" generates an .xml file but I cant get rePhase to open that.. is it intended to work? What is really the difference between...

If I have a measurement (SPL and Phase tab) that was generated from an EQ session with filters and I try to do Export the filter settings as "formatted text" or as "text", I get a table with zeros in both cases. But I see in the left pane that the in the bottom info area for the particular...

I hope I'm correct in that: FR trace linearity is not important as the "krocket" stimuli is the same for all measurements. The stimuli has gone through signal processing as it is excited by my DSP active 2-way stereo system - using only one channel at the time for measurements! But, should it...

I do my calibration trials with substitution method. I place the ref 40 cm from the source and mark the tip of the mic very careful with a thin thread with a knot hanging from the roof. Do a sweep and record with the reference mic. Then place the mic to be calibrated in the exact same position...

OK - so I need to redo the measuremnts with the FR compensations in place and then do phase corrections on these... right!? //

Is it at all possible to preserve some phase data through this process. It seems that the generated difference traces dont contain such data - maybe its not possible... my math fails me again :) //

I clearly don't know what I'm doing. Where does it say that it's a "summing" action? Didn't get that. Anyways.. I should use the "Align SPL..." tool in this case I suppose? And "Remember to use "Add offset to data" after you move it."! //

Thanks for the answer - I managed to priced the files. There are many ways to do it it seems.. The below video is was my experience and caused the question about changing shape... //

Hallo! I'm trying to calibrate 2 microphones that I built to one commercial good microphone. So I have three measurements made in the exact same location with the same sweep stimuli. Absolute linearity is not important - I regard Ref as linear :) My problems: - There is quite a big gain...

Hi! I think it would be useful and support the understanding of impact from room if there could be possible to add a scale indicating distance corresponding to the displayed time information - use 340 m/s... Like the support for the frequency scale where "Mid" and "Upper mid" etc is indicated...

Make 4 channels out of the 2 stereo ones. Add to the individual channels, resources that really belong to them; X-over and driver specific fault corrections. Then, do measurement of whole system and do EQ to the incoming channels L and R. //