Recent content by Stewix

Well, what can I say... You have been awesome!... Thanks for the "guidance" and for all the clarifications!...

Great!... Thanks!... Ok, sorry to bother you further, just one last thing (I promise): what if I want to use, for example, the "minimum phase" (smoothed) responses for the "normal signal channels", and the "measured phase" (not smoothed) responses for the "crosstalk channels"?... How can I be...

Oh, ok; so it depends on how they were created... Just out of curiosity: is there a way to restore/preserve their relative levels?... If there is not, like I said, not a big deal: it is enough to adjust their levels elsewhere, using the "measured" (not smoothed) ones as a reference...

Ok, perfect: now I think I understand better your "perplexities" regarding what I was trying to do... Anyway, I've done some more tests (with various sine tones at different frequencies), and I've seen that, with the "measured" (but smoothed) impulses, the phase relationship between, for...

Like the actual "measured" (but NOT smoothed) one?...

Hi! First of all, many thanks for your time, that is really appreciated!... By saying that the "temporal factor" is excluded, I simply mean that, in this case, one is measuring an analog piece (a tape machine, but if it was a preamp or compressor it should roughly be the same) which has no...

Ok, I think I get what you are saying, thanks!... Just one (still related) last thing: can you elaborate a bit about the fact that "fractional octave smoothing is a process which doesn't have a physical analogue", please?... Do you mean that, in my case, it would be better to use another kind...

Ok, following your instructions has been "a piece of cake", and I've been able to export a smoothed version of the measured impulse, thanks!... If you don't mind I would like to ask another question which is strictly related to what I asked in the OT (otherwise I would open another thread)...

First of all, you (and your software) are awesome!... Many many thanks for the answer!... Regarding the fact that it is "debatable": I tend to agree, because with smoothing one is already altering in some way the actual response, like you are confirming... The alternative is to use the response...

Instead of doing a simple "bump" I think it is better if I explain myself in more details... In the case of emulating the ambiance of an actual space, it should be better to export the "measured" (not smoothed) response... In fact, in this case, one is using the "unmodified" impulse response...

Hi all!... I wanted to ask a question, but I think that some background could be of help, because I'm not using REW for the usual things (I'm using it for music production)... I learned how to use it when I had to measure my treated room, but then I've used it to create some impulse responses...