Recent content by Presently42

  1. P

    New eq selection request

    Well, that's done the trick! Partially. It seems that the Q value I must put in is the inverse of the equation above, and then multiplied by root 2. Furthermore, this only works if I set my system to use, say, 48 kHz (the upper limit of my poor old USB to DAC interface), and REW to use at least...
  2. P

    New eq selection request

    Ah, the StormAudio one looks promising! Alas, though, it only offers twelve filters, which is simply insufficient. Ah well, looks like I'll have to multiply by root 2 or more for now! Speaking of this, I don't suppose you know a nice equation which gives the amount by which one must multiply...
  3. P

    New eq selection request

    Makes sense. I'll stick with just editing text files. It's no biggie. On the bass issue, I spent at least an hour last night trying to get the bass of the Harman Target curve to match the bass of the HD800 curve. After looking at both the REW wiki and trying several different filters and...
  4. P

    New eq selection request

    That's an excellent feature! However, as I'd like to take certain ranges of the various curves, it is a bit clunky: it only allows me to take one curve and substitute another from a given point onwards - unless I'm not using it properly! Furthermore, saving a new curve using the merge B to A...
  5. P

    New eq selection request

    With the first example, though the target (HD600) is indeed below the measurement (HD800), the filters have caused the bass to go too low by around five dB. In contrast to the rest of the curve, which is matched very well indeed, the bass here is very off. I can only attribute this to the bass...
  6. P

    New eq selection request

    The headroom gain is an excellent addition! However, as the gain is always negative, wouldn't having the figure labelled as such be wise? An unknowing user might accidentally add positive gain, resulting in clipping. When trying to match my headphones to another set, for example, setting a...
  7. P

    New eq selection request

    Given that the boost has to by applied, that my headphone's curve match the desired target curve, and given that I apply global negative volume which matches the peak level of the added eq filters, why not both suggest the requisite negative volume to be applied (currently a feat achievable only...
  8. P

    New eq selection request

    In addition to this new eq selection request, might I also request that the bass be automatically adjusted? As it is, trying to match my headphone's curve to the chosen (Harman) target results in my having to manually add the necessary bass eq points. I, of course, compensate my reducing the...
  9. P

    New eq selection request

    I tried all of the others and found three (I think) eq selections which were closer, but not only still required further calculation, but also only had six or some such number of eq points - a number insufficient to get very close to the curve. As for the eq match, I'd thought of it, but I'm not...
  10. P

    New eq selection request

    I've a request for a new eq selection, though I'm unsure where I should post such a request. In any event, I've been using Fab Filter Pro Q to tune my headphones to various eq curves. I've been using the generic eq from REW, as this allows for the greatest precision. However, it doesn't...
Top Bottom