Recent content by niziers

  1. N

    Spacial Average Measurements

    Hi 60seconds, I guess your room is properly insulated so that there is not that much reflexions. that's what your measurments tend to prove as you've no differences until 6kHz. The room might not be that big too so that you have not that much far reflexions. At the end, it's also a question of...
  2. N

    Spacial Average Measurements

    Hi, remember that vector average will tend to simulate direct sound measurement (reflexions canceled). That's not what your ears will hear. Human ears and brain average direct sound and early reflexion, and reject far reflexions. 30 to 40 ms seems to be the correct threshold. Then instead of...
  3. N

    Spacial Average Measurements

    Hi John, Fair enough. Thanks for the reply. It's in line with my thought. This function should be used for phase correction only, not for amplitude correction as I read somewhere. REW is a so great piece of software. Thank you. Xavier
  4. N

    Spacial Average Measurements

    Thanks jtalden. I agree with you, verctor average is better to retreive direct sound phase (as FDW is) Then the question is why REW recommand to use vector average to perform amplitude correction at the listeniing position whilst it is not consistant with scalar average measurement ? What we...
  5. N

    Spacial Average Measurements

    Hi, Thanks for your help. Yes impulse are aligned before vector averaging. And no FDW applied. Here is a link to the 9 measurements you can play with : www.transfernow.net/226pg8i48ada
  6. N

    Spacial Average Measurements

    Hi John, I got annoyed by the "Vector Average" function that elaborates an averaged IR from spatial measurements. It is suggested that this function must be used for amplitude correction. But I guess amplitude correction should not take into account the phase of the different measured IR. This...
Top Bottom