Recent content by navid0308

Can confirm it's behaving more predictably with the high shelf. Thank you for this update!

Thanks for the prompt response! Here you go. Just as a FYI, the responses are aligned to the target @ 75db, however, after FDW with 15 cycles, the level drops by about 0.5db, that's why in my screenshots you saw the level @ 74.5db.

With everything maxed out, it still settles on a negative shelf that drops it below target. The main issue is that the other atmos channels have similar responses but they don't get a shelf like this, so it's introducing somewhat of an imbalance between TRL and TRR speaker pair. For reference...

What would cause the EQ to apply such an aggressive negative high shelf? You can see in the screenshots that the equalized response is well below the target after the shelf. Is it because I am using FDW? These are the settings I used-

Using beta 86, Overlays > Impulse seems to be crashing using older saved measurements.

One issue I have been fighting with REW with is EQ. Using API, REW refuses to EQ some areas, however if I use the "Match response to target" from the EQ tab, it correctly EQs the response. Is this a known issue or are there any workarounds? This is an example but it happens in other cases as...

Noticing one weird thing - when using the API, Var smoothing vs No smoothing seems to have an effect below 100hz. I have a peak at about 46hz that, when running the EQ manually in REW, gets pulled down to my target curve. However, when I use the API to do it, depending on correction range and if...

Alright. I use this tool called ratbudyssey to view the raw audyssey measurements and that usually gets the spl level spot on. I tried to post the link to my impulse responses as well as the git repo for ratbuddyssey but since I'm new here, it doesn't let me. Added screenshots below. So far my...

Q - on beta 31 and earlier, when importing raw audyssey impulse measurements (when using the audyssey one script), they would hover around 120db. on beta 32 it seems to hover around 60db. the actual measurement level of these sweeps are closer to 75db. how exactly does rew determine the spl level?

Using the latest beta, when I run rms+phase avg or db+phase avg, the resulting response does not seem to track the combined magnitudes as expected.