Recent content by moedra

Correct. It's a 27-step procedure that generates filters which correct magnitude & phase (time) domain attributes for room correction. 27 steps takes a while to execute by hand, so I am trying to automate as much as possible to make more efficient use of my time. The idea in the beginning of...

Yes, but what if I want the smoothed data (as with minphase copy) but with the original phase response in the measurement (not minphase)? I'm trying to omit the "export frequency response as text with smoothing and bring it back in" approach, since there's no export function in the API. I tried...

Is there a way to simply commit smoothing data to a measurement? If so, I could simply have the macro do that instead of using export/import to obtain a raw measurement that has smoothed data baked into it. The reason I'm doing what I'm doing is because I want the arithmetic calculations to be...

I guess what's important, ultimately, is that the functions I am trying to execute can actually be done in a scripted macro. I don't necessarily care if it's Python or some other language, as long as it works. Python is just the language Gemini chose to use, and since I don't know any better, I...

This may or may not help, but I don't have any other reference. Here is the terminal readout of the latest few iterations I've run on v10 of the script, along with Gemini's diagnosis below them. The latest version of said script is at the bottom. I am trying to get the steps to work one at a...

Hi John. I need some help. I am not a coder, but I am trying to enlist the help of Gemini to write some macros for REW using the API and I am hitting a wall where REW will not release the data needed to make the macros function properly. The hard part is that I don't understand Python code or...

I thought about doing this. Haven't tried it yet. I was thinking that it would be difficult, upon examining the recorded measurements, to identify which one went with which position. I suppose I'd have to keep track of it on a diagram. Each measurement would have to default to the ETC graph for...

I'm working with a lot of people who are currently playing reflection detective and something like this would save so much time.

I figured, but what if those sweeps were relatively short - like 256k - and repeating? REW's generator can already do that. It can also be told at what frequency to start and stop the sweep for the sake of what is being done. All that's needed is a method to read these sweeps in a real-time...

I am very conscious of what the RTA is. My question has to do not with the standard use of tracking SPL response, but with the idea of tracking reflections (i.e. the ETC graph) in real time to make hunting for room treatment points on walls faster than the standard measure-move a...

I seem to recall that there was a way to check for phase issues between channels (where they are out of phase with each other) from the LP by comparing some of the averages together. I can't remember exactly what to do to get the result I want, though. I do know that the mic remains stationary...

That method there produces some fine minimum phase filters using inversion. It's the best I have been able to come up with, plus it's relatively simple to execute.

If you make correction filters from vector average responses instead of dB or RMS responses, there will always be differences because the vector average is not a true representation of magnitude like a dB or RMS average is.

My response featured a typo, which I have fixed. It said that FDW will ignore the dips. What I meant to say was that the FDW will not ignore the dips. We don't want those dips included in the FDW calculations. Acourate's psychoacoustic treatment removes them prior to applying FDW. The only way...

The problem with FDW in Room EQ Wizard is that it is applied without a psychoacoustic treatment ahead of it. This may be appropriate in certain situations but if the goal is to generate perceptually accurate acoustic correction, you have to apply a psychoacoustic treatment to the response ahead...