Recent content by MF_Kitten

I'm doing headphone measurements with an IEC 711 compliant coupler, using calibration files that are generic to this type of coupler. That means anyone else's measurements with a compliant rig will be comparable to my own. I have access to a lot of measurements of headphones on identical rigs...

There's additional compensation being done by default to make the resulting graph more comparable to things like Innerfidelity's measurements. This mostly consists of lowering the treble from 2KHz up I believe. Even then, if one simply wanted to do a perfect single band correction, I am not...

This is hard to really explain, but I will try to make it clear. If you look at raw measurements made with professional systems, like GRAS, you will see what looks like a regular frequency response graph that is "bent" and warped. When you then overlay the compensation curve, you can see that...

I have been working with my EARS rig for a while now, and have figured out some of the quirks and oddities it presents. The compensation files you are presented seem to be an average of several results. The problem with this when using EARS vs an open-air mic is that the measurements will vary...

Thanks! I've seen some headphone measurements where everyone gets a big deep dip aomewhere, and then the CSD graphs show a peak that just gets phased out somehow. Very odd. That's the most obvious place I've seen this phenomenon.

I've been EQing studio monitors and subwoofers and headphones with REW measurements and filters for a while now, and I very early on devided I didn't like doing additive bell curve corrections to correct for dips. I haven't really checked it out in a long time, so I can't say I have a good...