Recent content by KeesH_TNe

John, mea culpa, indeed, the smoothing just acts in the way you suggest and as I need: with 1/6 octave smoothing I end up with some 160 points: perfect! For one reason or the other I had in mind that this output file was NOT reduced in length if the smoothing was switched on; but, it does...

MasterLufter, I agree and disagree. Agree: more-than-one-channel is very powerful and widely applicable. And the interface is important, but not to the utmost. So here I tend to be more optimistic. Firstly, going beyond N=2 inputs might indeed get costly, also when it comes to the interface...

Severely delayed, but despite.. I also would be highly interested in that feature being available. It would allow to quantify the place-to-place correlation in a room, which, if properly used, should(!) provide extra information on e.g. the location of a strong absorber or reflector (and so...

Very good remark! Of course the mentioned 128 k datapoints refers to the number of samples taken at the defined sample rate. And the sample rate is imperative if high-frequencies are to be accomodated. My "file-size-issue" relates to the resolution obtained/displayed in the transfer function...

For my purpose (in- and outdoor sound transmission and scattering research) the minimal file size of 128k points per sweep is much too large. Is there a way to reduce this number of points (typ. 8k would suit me fully), while retaining (!) the sweep duration? Interested in any response.