Recent content by G29

Hi John, Is the new API feature meant to automate/script repetitive work flows and settings (like setting the sound card so it doesn't change) ? Could you add some use cases for the new API feature to the 1st post ? TIA

=) Consider #1 requested if and when you can fit it in. Thought it might be some sort of windowing/UI limitation. The stacking order routinely gets mixed so the drag and drop fails. Thanks much.

Is there a reason why one can't drag and drop .wav files into the Overlay window in Linux the same was as dragging and dropping into the main window ? Thanks much.

@John Mulcahy , Thanks much !!! V5.20.14 early access build Builds updated today with these changes: Added: Trace options include a thick stroke choice Changed: Export impulse as WAV allows sample counts up to 4M Changed: Tweaks to delay estimation Fixed: RTA on/off button was larger than...

Sorry JoinUs, my post was not related to yours. Pilot error on my part.

Deleted. Confused sample rate with frequency range.

Hi John, I have tried 2M, 11.9 second sweeps (up from 512k, 3 seconds), but the "Export this sample count:" still offers up to 131,072 and "Place t=0 at sample index:" maxes out at 16,384. Not able to set the center to 131,072 and the output number of samples to 262,144. Also, is there a...

Question about "Export / Export Impulse Response as WAV". The highest number of samples offered to export is 131,072, yet sample rates offered are up to 1,536 kHz. That is @ 3 seconds for 44.1kHz and @ 3/4 of a second for 176.4kHz. Is it possible to have higher number of sample options to...

Y-Axis display issue. Sometimes the bottom (low frequency range) of the Spectrogram displays blank space instead of the plot. This plot shows the bottom is blank below @ 48Hz. UPDATE: The bottom of the plot is tied to the After Peak Span settings so this may be as designed.

Yep, display the entire speaker.

I meant displaying 4 items at different X offsets (x1=sub freq range, x2=bass freq range, x3=mid freq range, x4=high freq range) so basically expanding the following to 3 or 4 horizontally . versus 4 of these occupying the same x1, y1, z1 location (porridge). Hope that is more clear.

@sm52 Sorry I wasn't more clear. It took me a while to understand your usage of the term "porridge" because I was thinking horizontal distribution and not overlays for this use case. I was not suggesting 4 overlays occupying the same X/Y/Z space because as you put it, it would be "porridge". =)

I do it all the time with 2 adjacent drivers or XO FIRs, thus the request to do it with a 3 or 4 way speaker design for a complete view of the entire speaker. With shallow slopes, you can analyze the overlap of more than 2 drivers. To address yours specific question if I have seen it...

I use it to visualize a 2-way, 3-way, 4-way XO speaker and them compare it against their actual measurements. I make FIR XO's in RePhase and then analyze them in REW before applying them to the actual system. I can inspect all 4 in 2D plots, but not 3D Waterfall plots unless I pre-composite...

Sure, simultaneously being able to display 4 items (4 XO filters, 4/SubLowMidHigh driver measurements, etc.) in a Waterfall plot versus just 1 or 2. Same functionality, just increase the number of plots from 2 to 4.