Recent content by fattire

  1. fattire

    V5.20.14 early access build

    Much appreciated! I'll have to wait for the build. The internal loopback on the Evo 16 is fixed to channels 23-24.
  2. fattire

    V5.20.14 early access build

    Beta Version ea66 ... I'm getting an ArrayIndexOutOfBounds error when trying to take a sweep measurement. It happens with single or multi-input measurements. Audient Evo 16 using loopback as timing reference. The level check works fine. The measurement sweep runs and sounds as expected...
  3. fattire

    V5.20.14 early access build

    Now why in the world would I miss something obvious. Never happens. I swear. Unless I publicly post somewhere. Thanks, John and sorry for the Friday afternoon / evening stupidity.
  4. fattire

    V5.20.14 early access build

    5.20.14ea18 Am I missing the option to hide the distortion detail when using the RTA? There doesn't seem to be a way ‍♂️
  5. fattire

    V5.20.14 early access build

    Found a repeatable bug / crash when using the RTA. Multi-mic capture. Pink noise via generator. RTA set to capture individual traces for all mics plus the peak. After capture, hit the "Both" button to save measurements and you get an array index out of bounds java exception: EDIT: This is...
  6. fattire

    Failing to install on MacOS Ventura Dev Beta

    Confirming the issue is resolved in the latest 5.20.14 build. Thank you, sir!
  7. fattire

    Failing to install on MacOS Ventura Dev Beta

    I see new builds / releases and will try those later today. I wanted to drop a note that I was able to get 5.20.3 installed with no issue on Ventura. Upgrades still had the same problem.
  8. fattire

    Failing to install on MacOS Ventura Dev Beta

    @John Mulcahy - I'm having this issue as well. 2021 14" M1 MBP. I did a fresh install of the final version, not an upgrade, of MacOS 13 (Ventura). I get behavior identical to R3k's above with both 5.20.13 and the 5.20.14 early access versions.
  9. fattire

    Impulse Response Discrepancy - Intel vs M1 Mac

    I’ll try this on my 2020 M1 MBP later this week. I can’t do it on the work machine (2019 Intel), and the 2021 M1 Pro MBP doesn’t support Big Sur.
  10. fattire

    Impulse Response Discrepancy - Intel vs M1 Mac

    TL;DR - Working as expected on the latest MBP that brings back on-board HDMI. I have no idea what's up with those other machines. Or why no one else has seen this before. Glad it appears to be all sorted though. Thanks @John Mulcahy and @sam_adams for the thoughts on this one. 2021 M1 MBP...
  11. fattire

    Impulse Response Discrepancy - Intel vs M1 Mac

    Brief update ... I had a reason to remeasure with Dirac, and captured the impulse response there. This is the M1 MBP with the same UMIK-2 and cal file. The pre-correction IR is below, and shows the center as ~1.75ms before the mains which is accurate. It's definitely HDMI related ... somehow...
  12. fattire

    Impulse Response Discrepancy - Intel vs M1 Mac

    It also wouldn't explain why I see a ~10 ms delay for only the center on some later Intel Macs. The only common denominator between the systems showing this odd behavior is the required use of a dongle to connect HDMI (and the same SSP of course). Unfortunately, it seems that it is also...
  13. fattire

    Impulse Response Discrepancy - Intel vs M1 Mac

    No joy. Identical results with a 3rd-party HDMI adapter and a different, known good HDMI cable (6 foot length used on the Xbox all the time) on a different input of the SSP. I used a higher low frequency as a starting point to ensure the start of the sweep was sufficiently above the noise...
  14. fattire

    Impulse Response Discrepancy - Intel vs M1 Mac

    That's a good suggestion. I need to double check but I believe it's a 25 foot HDMI 2.0 cable. I'll try a shorter one that is known-good. It's easy to use the cable connected to the Xbox Series X, and that cable passes 4K60 UHD, Atmos, etc. to the processor and then to the receiver without...
  15. fattire

    Impulse Response Discrepancy - Intel vs M1 Mac

    I'm not measuring subs, though; they're muted via miniDSP. These are standard LCR speakers (Revel F228Be L/R & C426Be C if it matters). Though that could be a suggestion to start the low end of the sweeps at a higher frequency where there is more separation from the noise floor - sorry...
Top Bottom