Recent content by Cornelis Huizinga

Hi Bernt, You were absolutely right. With the automatic polarity check disabled, the measurements for both 6.29 and 7.0 were identical. The tweeters are now set to a delay of 0 and the midwoofers to 0.05. Yesterday's measurements looked quite messy. I live next to a busy road and the attic...

In addition: If I compare the measurement between version 6.29 and 7.0, the difference between right tweeter and midrange is at 7.0 (31ms) and 6.29 (127ms)

Hi Bernt, Hopefully what I did is correct. First I filtered the measurement with the 7.0 version and then I zoomed in on the tweeter and midrange impulses on the filtered measurement. The result is visible on the enclosed screenshot. I hope this is useful to you. Cornelis

Today I started using version 0.7. First I aligned the microphone as best as possible. I measure with a Motu UltraLite mk5, so no hassle with 2 devices. The first measurement of my active 3-way speakers was disappointing. The first screenshot shows that the right tweeter and midrange have no...

http://archimago.blogspot.com/

I set the setting to 5 Hz, but this did not affect the step response much. Still, I'm happy with your tip, because I didn't know you could change this setting. Thanks to all the instructions, I have come one step further. The sound is now really very good (I think) for a typical Dutch living...

Thank you very much for the effort you took to help me. This morning I played music for an hour with your settings. Your target curve is really nice to listen to. Voices sound very natural. This thread encourages me to experiment again with different settings, even though I don't always...

I would really appreciate it if you would look at my measurement if you have time. I have now used your HP40 curve for my attic speakers and I must say I have never heard them so good. If all goes well, the measurement, a screenshot of the CPD and the speaker setup are in the zip file. I...

Hi Moedra, This thread is particularly educational for me. I thought I was doing reasonably well with my targets, but when I started simulating with your HP30 target, I suddenly had a much better step response. I always thought that you should follow the measurement as closely as possible...

https://audiophilestyle.com/ca/immersive/digital-signal-processing-the-definitive-guide-to-high-end-immersive-audio-r1251/

Before I had theMotu, I used a Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 for recording and the OktoDAC8 for playback. With measurements of more than 5 seconds, things usually started to stutter or loud clicks sounded, making the measurement unreliable. Measurements of 5 seconds were not affected by this, but the...

The difference will be within tolerance, as you noted. In any case, the difference between the Motu and measuring with 2 different devices is a fact. Measurements longer than 5 seconds were not possible anyway.

I took a screenshot from another computer with Al, this makes it look like I measured with Asio4All, but it was with a Motu and their asio drivers. As you can see, the difference is not earth-shattering, but it is present and repeatable. The step response was also slightly better at 10 seconds...

I have exactly the same measuring setup. Have you tried increasing recording time? If I go from 5 to 10 seconds, the time delay of the drivers changes

I had the same problem. However, the measurement was carried out correctly. After reinstalling Audiolense, the speaker check control was working correct again.