Recent content by ceh383

I think no and yes. I don't believe it is a design intent, but yes the variance from target is more pronounced. I was looking above 100hz, as was Sonnie. DL, can only boost 10db, at least with the 88a. If you look closely you will see why the greater variance from the target is there. I would...

Looking at the average spectrum before on the stereo vs the NAD, it looks like much better native response in the stereo graph, and DL had less to do. Are these the same speakers, placement and room?

This is interesting, although with the DDRC88, I'm not sure how much it matters. While it is true the mixing is after the DL filters, all the XO's/routing are/is done before the filters and all subs are filtered as one. I would like to see some graphs comparing the two methods of implementing...

Only one connection to the amps? Can you elaborate? It sure would be nice to get rid of some of the cable mess behind my component rack.

I really like what Dirac does for the clarity of center channel dialogue, much better than YPAO does. I'm running a Yamaha with the DDRC-88a. Aside from the ATMOS channels being eq'd by Dirac, would you say there are other benefits to going with the NAD?

Could you not edit the DL target curve for the center channel to bump it up a few db's? It might not be the preferred way, but it should work.

My setup can't compare to some here... 1 SVS PC12+ (sealed mode) 1 PSA S1500 I wish I could do more, but no room...