Recent content by Bentxu

  1. B

    Feature Requests

    Thanks for the reply John, highly appreciated. Let's say I boost with 12 dB individual and max boost and the suck out is 8 dB, then it would still try to boost the suck out? As for target match range: yes, this can obviously be done. But let's assume one does a wideband with 2 suckouts. I...
  2. B

    Feature Requests

    @John Mulcahy a couple of feature Requests that I find useful (and have no idea how difficult it would be to implement). Background to these is that I use REW for car audio, which may result in a bit odd need from a home audio perspective. i) have an undo feature for EQ optimizations...
  3. B

    Feature Request: have RTA measurement stop after a certain number of averages

    Heroic effort on the quick implementation @John Mulcahy !
  4. B

    Feature Request: have RTA measurement stop after a certain number of averages

    @John Mulcahy would be great if one could set the RTA measurements in a way that they stop after a certain number of user defined averages. I usually stop after 100. However, sitting in a car with a moving mic it can get stressful to stop the RTA measurement while still moving the mc. Would be...
  5. B

    V5.20.14 early access build

    @John Sorry for never replying to this. You are right. Works for me now too. But as you said, does not work on old measurements. Another feature request: Would it be possible to put a freehand value (or some more fixed ones like 50, 75, 100) after which to stop an TRA measurement? Think the...
  6. B

    V5.20.14 early access build

    @John Mulcahy not sure if it is a bug or a feature and if it is a bug, if it has been reported. When I set "Target Type" to "None" in "EQ Preferences" and then want to EQ with a generic EQ, it sets the target to Subwoofer. Needs to be changed every time. It does not seem to be picking up the...
  7. B

    V5.20.14 early access build

    Heroic, thank you @John Mulcahy
  8. B

    V5.20.14 early access build

    @John Mulcahy, thanks for making such a great tool. Loving every bit of it. Not a bug report but more of a feature request for the Generic / Configurable PEQ. Would it be possible to also include XOs X1 and X2 similar to the Generic / Generic implementation? Love the ability to have more than 20...
Back
Top