Recent content by armagedon

Thank you very much for your detailed response. I completely understand what you're explaining and I agree that spectrograms and frequency response graphs inherently represent data differently. One displaying time-evolving energy versus the other showing integrated overall energy. My...

Sir, Currently, the spectrogram scale does not accurately reflect the house curve as intended. Typically, when using a spectrogram, our goal is to visualize details that might not be clearly visible in the frequency response graph alone. Implementing the proposed adjustment would enable users...

may be it will be better with an example: this is a curve equalized to a given house curve: the spectrogram is like this: all good :) this representation only show when is above 75dB, but the house curve is not 75dB flat. this makes difficult to do verification. now I use the SPL reference...

I hadn't considered that. I just tested it, and it seems that the spectrogram currently doesn't take this into account. However, it would indeed be very beneficial if it worked that way.

thank you for accepting it. I have another suggestion regarding the spectrogram feature. Currently, the color bar uses a linear scale, which is already good. However, it might also be helpful if users could select an alternative scale based on the house curve showing values relative to it...

hello, as a feature request, is it possible to be able to upload House curve data via API (POST /eq/house-curve-data ?) as is available for frequency responses (/import/frequency-response-data) thank you.

check previous change log :)

the graph metric function is very useful for signal analyse, would really love to see it available into the API :)

Thanks to Mr @John Mulcahy I was able to put REW into a container. Those who only need to query the API can benefit from this. Starting it on the cloud or anywhere else is an option. I share it with all of you with humility. https://hub.docker.com/r/jaoued/roomeqwizard

thank you for your response. If I uncheck the option "Full scale sine rms is 0 dBFS" the 94dB shift but in the wrong way and the full scale stay unchanged : still feel lost

thank you for sharing your experience. can not understand the values in REW: why REW do not show -12,37 value ( ? can't figure out the 3,01dB difference the full scale should not be 106,37 (94 + 12,37) ? this is what the doc seems to tell : calfiles is the "AGain =18dB" as something to do...

thank you sir, is this list can be viewed somewhere?

thank you for the update. everything is working perfectly. I would like to take this opportunity to also ask for an other feature request. nothing urgent. this concern the measurement window. It is possible to port some of the new functionality to "from file" playback. the idea is to load atmos...

thank you for all you are doing for us. waiting for next release.

hello, first tank you for this amazing software. I actively support it. I have 3 feature request. 1: it is possible to add support for "addMTW" into the API (/measurements/{id}/ir-windows) like it doing for "addFDW". 2: it is possible to force the "Align offset" value, through the API. For 2...