Decay and FR are interrelated. Reducing the peak will simultaneously reduce the decay. However, perceptually, a high Q "sharp" peak like that around 80-90hz can give the speaker a more "punchy"/dynamic sound. There's at least one manufacturer who deliberately does this, albeit at 80Hz, not 90...
Hi Marian, nice dual purpose room, I'm envious of your exercise equipment ;-).
I very often see threads like these on forums, so I'm curious, when you first placed the speakers and set up equipment, did you listen and hear how it sounded, prior to measuring and treating? Apologies if I missed...
It was nice meeting Todd there. Unfortunately my PSR demo did not happen, I need to work on mic array placement and recording in PSR generally. Next year..;-). JS I swore I saw you or you Doppelganger......
I haven't told him yet because I haven't built the 5 speakers yet. Wednesday...hopefully. :cool:
The Titans are 22 drivers per speaker and must be measured far field...almost done
No disadvantage, downsampling has been transparent for decades. I have an ancient Sony BDP, but unfortunately no BR-A discs (like yours) to test it with, other than my own creations. I would just enjoy the music
No, some go to 40k because there's no point to low passing at 14k. Plenty younger folks can hear above that.
Only one worse that BStuart is Ohashi. :) His paper is complete nonsense. The NHK replica that showed his experiment used flawed speakers and missed confounders...
That would make say a 22.05kHz low pass filter vs unfiltered audible then. Please present your evidence. Any reference to Bob Stuart results in immediate striking of the gong.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.