Recent content by AdamA

Had another experiment today, first up was moving the front left up against the front wall to see if that improves the response but no such luck as it made very little difference. I next tried many different things with the centre channel including moving it up against the front wall, moving it...

From my testing to find the best subwoofer location I found that the rear row has a better subwoofer response than the front row due to the rear sub being near field to the rear row. In regard to the mid & upper frequencies I have not tested to see which seating position is the best out of the...

As I said I measured at each of the four seating positions which is one of the reasons why I took so many measurements. I then painstakingly tried all the different combinations of subwoofer placements & orientations to find the one that gave me the best response for all four seats. All taken...

Well, sort of. I guess you have answered my question into if the room is over treated. I do still wonder if treating a home theatre has a different approach to treating a home studio. I still have my poor integration of the mains & surrounds with thin/lean bass issue. I spent two days...

Well I though my issue was to much treatment which I thought was causing the issues I describe in my initial post such as poor integration of the mains & surrounds with thin/lean bass. That is when I was asked to provide measurements & we started down this road of looking else where to find the...

Apologies for the images, I though instead of just posting the .mdat files like I did last time I would upload the images to as I was receiving requests for measurements that were contained within the .mdat files. I thought it would be easier for people to see the data right here instead of...

Can REW perform short tone bursts for speaker measurements? The on & off axis measurements above are apparently in accurate as I was using continuous tones instead of short tone bursts. This means that the room is a factor in the measurements which is obviously not what I wanted. I just want...

So here is L, C ,R including subs all with an 80Hz crossover & all EQ enabled. The other file is the L, C, R individually & the subs individually all with an with 80Hz crossover NO EQ. All these measurements are at my seating location. If I have missed any requests for other measurements...

The Dirac Live bass management module is not available to any home theatre AVR's yet & my model wont be receiving the capability so it means upgrading my AVR to be able to take advantage of the module. All this RT60 & ETC's is brand new to me so you will have to bear with me. I am guess that...

Does the "+ sub" measurements in the .mdat file not answer that question? Correct & I also run M.S.O but all the measurements I have posted so far are without any EQ whatsoever. Here is the response of the subs only at my four seating locations with M.S.O active.

In the .mdat above there are six measurements, the ones labelled with "only" are just the L, C, R with an 80Hz crossover in place. When I run Dirac it sets the distances & levels in a separate memory on my AVR. If I set the distances now with Dirac disabled they will not be applied when Dirac...

Yes these measurements are with the speakers set to large in the AVR, that's is why I labelled the measurements with the "Large" designation. I thought that is what you requested? L, C, R on their own? No EQ, no crossover? I just need to get you the subs on their own, no crossover, no EQ?

I have attached measurements of the L, C, R alone with no EQ. I don't have just the subs without EQ so I will have to take that measurement. I took the measurements around 15dB below where I usually listen. Yes all these measurements are with an 80Hz crossover in place. I do have a version...

That 15dB jump below 200Hz is without any EQ so I can only come to the conclusion that it is caused by the room or speaker placement?

Looking over my measurements the area that stands out to me is between 100Hz & 200Hz, I first though this drop in the response was due poor integration between the mains & subs but this drop in the response is also present in the response of just the mains without the subs. I have attached...