Recent content by juicehifi

Usually better to stop ttd earlier or at the same frequency. Aim for a correction filter with a quiet top ( as few saw-teeth as possible when you zoom in on the impulsenof the correction filter)

This is for sure not an anechoic representation. If it were, the bass would have dropped off earlier … and more. Furthermore, the energy storage and energy level seems to be the same as in room. All the sound that’s kicking and bouncing from surface to surface is still present, just in a...

Scale 300 and which resolution?

Which resolution are we talking about?

^ Yes that’s correct.

The measurement is done using a multichannel wave file with sweep in only one channel at a time. So this does not come from Audiolense. Most audio drivers have issues, vut some more than others…. Try to play around with different apis (Wasapi, Direct Sound, WinMME), use a low sample rate …...

No it’s not the same. 2.0 «only» does frequency correction. «Only» Imo this gets you 90% there. Sometimes more, sometimes less. But generally so much so that 2.0 users tend to describe the improvements the same way as the xo users. But it’s almost impossible to ignore the difference once...

If you use 80.0 and 80.1, each speaker will have its own unique integration with the subwoofer. So... better subwoofer integration (usual) and more correction filters.

The table you posted is perfect for stereo. In addition, in the speaker tab, something like this: Routing both left and right to both subs will give mono sub output.

You need a mediator to make the convolver work with windows sound. And my clear recommendation for that is jriver. Install jriver and activate its wdmaudio driver. Choose Jriver as default sound card in Windows. Choose Audiolense as Jriver’s sound card. Keep Jriver open at all times. It needs...

Great find!

In Audiolense you can save the corrections as mono wave files. And I believe you can use Audacity (open source) to split and combine as you are asking for here.

I only read the last (readable) part. There seem to be a lot of good info in there. On first sight it looks like a good starting point. My own experience with AI is from using ChatGPT. It typically provides an answer that is quite similar to, but not always a good answer. The human eye, ear and...

That works too, but it requires more manual work. Be diligent about defining the play back formats properly.

I am at my phone now, so no screendump. Just press «new measurement» and edit the outputs as you want. The numbers in the left side…