RT 60 measurements "not reliable" (orange). Why

Discussion in 'Official REW (Room EQ Wizard) Support Forum' started by ReDRuM, Feb 3, 2019.

  1. ReDRuM

    ReDRuM Member
    Thread Starter

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2017
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello,

    I'm wondering what influences the "not reliable" parameter for RT60 measurements. I'm testing some panels, and am noticing that while testing the empty room, RT60 measurements are rarely labeled as "not reliable", but with panels added, many more values are flagged. The sweep is fairly loud (I had it even louder for "treated" measurements), so I doubt it's the noise floor.

    I know RT60 measurements don't really apply for small rooms... If that's the reason for the unreliable measurements (pushing the Schroeder frequency lower), I would really appreciate a bit more detailed explanation, especially if I can improve reliability in some way.

    Thank you!!!

    P.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. John Mulcahy

    John Mulcahy REW Author

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2017
    Messages:
    1,435
    Likes Received:
    241
    Values are flagged based on the correlation factor of the Schroeder curve, i.e. how linear the decay curve is. In a large space the decay curve is very linear to the point it reaches the noise floor, in smaller spaces the statistical conditions for a linear decay are not met, more so the lower the frequency gets. The panels remove some of the reflected energy and, presuming they are not evenly distributed around the space, make the soundfield less diffuse and increase the deviations from linearity.
     
    ReDRuM likes this.
  3. ReDRuM

    ReDRuM Member
    Thread Starter

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2017
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you :)
     

Share This Page